- Q: Why is Saul not really promising something extra to David in offering his daughter Merab to David?
- A: Saul was already obligated by his word to give one of his daughters in marriage to whomever slew Goliath.
- The men of Israel said, “Have you seen this man who is coming up? Surely he is coming up to defy Israel. And it will be that the king will enrich the man who kills him with great riches and will give him his daughter and make his father’s house free in Israel.”
- 1 Samuel 17:25
- Application: One of the distinguishing characteristics between the faithful and the unfaithful is the degree to which they keep their word. Those incapable of keeping their word with God are often betrayed by the fact they are incapable of keeping their word with men.
- Q: What was Saul’s true intention?
- A: Having unsuccessfully tried to kill David himself, he tries to get others to do it, in this case in the course of battle with the Philistines.
- Q: What would have been the greater tragedy had David married Merab?
- A: Ultimately all of her sons – heirs of Saul – had to be delivered to the Gibeonites to be hanged in order to make things right. It is possible that David would have found himself having to pay for Saul’s sins, so to speak, with his own sons’ lives.
- Q: What did Saul recognize in his youngest daughter Michal?
- A: Saul recognized that spiritually she would “become a snare to him”. He hoped this, combined with the threat from the Philistines, would ultimately take care of the problem for him.
- Q: Was Saul correct in his assessment of Michal?
- A: Yes. Michal would eventually turn on David and complete separation would ultimately result.
- Q: What did Saul do in the mean time to enhance his chances of overcoming David?
- A: Saul demanded from David what he thought would be an impossible dowry, hoping that David would be killed in the process of completing the task.
- Q: What is remarkable about David’s efforts?
- A: Saul only required “a hundred foreskins of the Philistines” (v.25) but David slew “two hundred men among the Philistines”. (v.27).
- Q: What is the contrast between Jonathan and Michal?
- A: Although both were children of Saul, both were a different kind of test of David’s love, the one responding in the best way possible, the other in the worst, most disappointing fashion.
- Application: David’s faith was tested in the presence of disappointment, first in the person of Saul who did not keep his word, then by the wife David ultimately was given. Jonathan, Saul, and Michal represent different types of people we encounter on a daily basis, and the quality of our faithfulness in dealing with each one reflects the overall quality of our spiritual faithfulness in our relationship with Christ. Some love us, some hate us, some eventually turn on us.
- Q: What was Saul’s final condition?
- A: “Saul was even more afraid of David”. (v.29) The unrighteous often express their fear of God by their treatment of others.
- Q: What was David’s final condition?
- A: “David behaved himself more wisely than all the servants of Saul. So his name was highly esteemed”. (v.30) The way the righteous treat others reflects the way they personally treat God in their life.